Test Search

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
08/04/2010
Benzene Toxicity

  more information
04/16/2010
Holiday Schedule for Patient Service Centers

  more information
04/14/2010
RML through JVHL is an Aetna Preferred Provider

  more information
09/18/2009
Ordering Tests for Seasonal Flu A/B and H1N1

  more information
06/10/2009
2006 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests.

  more information
04/10/2009
SERUM FREE LIGHT CHAINS, A New Test for Patients with Monoclonal Gammopathies

  more information
04/10/2009
UPDATE ON CRP AND hsCRP

  more information
02/04/2009
Article Answers Questions Re: Testing for GC/Chlamydia in Liquid Based Pap Collection Vials

  more information
10/10/2008
News & Notes Fall 2008

  more information
08/12/2008
Congratulations to Beth Peak

  more information
08/04/2008
RML, Inc. Receives Accreditation From College of American Pathologists

  more information
03/20/2008
Winter 2008 News & Notes

  more information
12/17/2007
Albuminuria signals increased cardiovascular risk

  more information
10/23/2007
New definition of "MI" poised for world domination

  more information
10/19/2007
News & Notes Summer 2007

  more information
05/18/2007
www.mybiopsy.org Informative Website Answers Questions About Cancer

  more information




Anergy Testing

Anergy testing is no longer recommended when tuberculin skin testing is performed. The laboratory will discontinue anergy testing January 15, 2003. This decision is based on guidelines published recently by the American Thoracic Society and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In the 1970s, anergy testing became common practice as a theoretical way to improve the reliability of negative tuberculin test results, despite lack of data to support this practice. Since then, studies have shown that the validity of the practice is questionable and may be misleading for the following reasons:
  1. Selective nonreactivity to purified protein derivative (PPD) antigen: five to ten percent of patients with active tuberculosis have negative tuberculin test results but a positive response to another antigen.
  2. Mumps reactivity may remain after loss of PPD reactivity.
  3. Patients with loss of PPD reactivity but positive reactions to control antigens can be boosted with a second tuberculin test seven to ten days later and may convert from a negative to a positive response.

Because of these findings, reactivity to control antigens with a negative response to PPD is not proof that the patient is not infected with tuberculosis. In addition, failure to respond to anergy tests does not mean the patient will not respond to PPD. Furthermore, anergy panels suffer from:

  • Lack of standardized protocols for antigen selection, including types and numbers of antigens that need to be placed.
  • Variability between lots of antigen available for purchase.
  • Lack of uniform criteria for defining cutaneous reactivity.
  • Regional variability in skin reactivity.
  • Inability of anergy testing to predict the risk of progression to active tuberculosis.

In conclusion, a negative tuberculin test does not exclude active or latent tuberculosis in the presence of a reaction to other antigens placed as controls. The only useful result from the intracutaneous tuberculin test (PPD) is a positive result. The only skin test available at RML after January 15, 2003 will be the tuberculin test.

References: CAP Today, Pathology/Laboratory Medicine/Laboratory Management, Vol. 15, No. 8; August 2001.